No matter how good (or bad) a site is, it's worthless if you have to stare at your screen for minute after minute waiting for the thing to load. Funny how so many designers forget that not so unimportant detail.
Posted by: Steve Hall at March 24, 2008 02:28 PM
--------------------------------------
That's right. It's annoying to wait for those sites to load but I think this one is worth waiting for anyway.
Posted by: Christoph at March 24, 2008 05:48 PM
--------------------------------------
it's just like the Y3 website from a few years back
Posted by: peth at March 25, 2008 02:53 AM
--------------------------------------
How amny times do we have to look at inane sites like this, wow a pyramid ...thats rotates ...then shows video no way ...Id rather watch the originals in Giza getting built
CAN WE PLEASE START FOCUSING ON IDEAS NOT navigation GIMMICKS ...this was obviously done by a 'cool factor' before function type studio...
so so so sad and laughable all at once ...
ideas first creative second
Posted by: Slasher at March 25, 2008 05:58 AM
--------------------------------------
And...it is quite similar to the new Diesel e-site. It feels like they had to fill the gap somehow.
Posted by: Teo at March 25, 2008 08:04 AM
--------------------------------------
The whole thing loaded in about 10 seconds for me, and I had no gaps or stutters. The user experience was quite smooth. Maybe they were experiencing very heavy traffic due to all the users you were driving to their site (go ahead, take the credit).
That voiceover is terrible, completely cheesy monologue. Much improved with the sound turned off.
The visual experience was interesting. The idea with the triangle, that some people here seemed to miss, was the correlation to the shape of the cut of the jeans to the body shape of the woman. When the triangle is small at the bottom, they are showing tapered cut jeans, fitted at the ankle. When it has the wide end of the triangle at the bottom, it is showing flared jeans (more boot-cut/bell-bottom style). The premise of the site is meant to be different cuts that accentuate the body shapes of different women.
I'm in total disagreement with most here. I don't think it was a visual gimmick with no idea, I think it was a good idea, with an OK, but not great, execution... basically done pretty well, but a good designer working with a mediocre copywriter. Definitely improved by turning the sound off.
Posted by: Chris G - GigantiCo at March 27, 2008 04:59 PM
--------------------------------------
|